ActiBookアプリアイコンActiBookアプリをダウンロード(無償)

  • Available on the Appstore
  • Available on the Google play

概要

縁19号

The beginning of the week started with a great welcome, learning about the facilities of the JPO andAPIC-JIPII. It was very revealing to understand the order that the JPO follows in its patent review processesand the resources allocated for it. Organization by technical subjects, with specialists for each sub-area ofspecialization, work with equipment accordingly. All designed to make the work as efficient as possible. Andwhat they achieve! All the statistics associated with performance by examiner are abysmally different fromour reality.Then we went into the challenges that Global Intellectual Property Strategy in the era of IoT, thanks tothe presentation of Mr. Jinzo FUJINO, FUJINO IP Management / Adjunct Professor of MIP, Tokyo Universityof Science, mainly discussing the legal implications beyond the mere interpretation within the framework ofindustrial protection legislation and how this issue crosses cross-disciplinary aspects.The week passed between search topics and tools for the development of this search, learning techniques,databases and tips to make this activity more efficient. Mr. Atsushi INOUE, Manager and Mr. TakuyaNAGAYOSHI, Chief Analyst IP Research Institute NGB Corporation, were our teachers. Many of the practiceslearned here are already part of my daily work.We also had the chance to visit one of the facilities of Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd. (Utsunomiya Factory).One of the leading companies in the world in terms of video broadcasting. This allowed me to see how therelationship between innovation, industry and protection occurs, since they are a company that generates asignificant number of patents.And of course, it would not be a course as such if it did not have a practical part.So, the rest of that week and part of the second one, was for the joint analysis of the legal regulationsthat Japan uses and the criteria to determine the novelty and the inventive level of an application (very similarto the national criteria).Then, being a course of specific topics, we were divided into work groups related to our professions andwe continued the work analyzing specific requests, generating debate and learning. Very enriching.Despite being complex issues to understand, these were explained through extremely simple examples,20 ENISHI IP Friends Connections August 2018 No.19