Home> Systems/Procedures> Designs> 【International Design Application】 Geneva Act (Hague Agreement)> Exceptions to Lack of Novelty of Design and "Proving Document"
Main content starts here.
Under the Japanese design registration system, a design registration shall not be granted for designs which have been published prior to the filing of a design registration application, in principle. However, strict application of this principle to all cases could bear an unfavorable result. Moreover, it could be said that such practice does not serve the purpose of the Design Act, which is to contribute to the development of the industry.
Given this fact, Exceptions to Lack of Novelty of Design is stipulated in the Design Act Article 4 which treats a design as one that does not lose novelty due to a previous publication, if the design has been published under specific conditions and a design registration application has been filed within 12 months from the date of publication.
It should be noted that Article 4 is an exception to the principle where a design registration shall not be granted to designs disclosed prior to the filing of a design registration application. Even in cases where your application is covered by Article 4, if, for example, a third party had filed a design registration application for the same or similar design or had published such design prior to the filing date of your design registration application, then you can't obtain a design registration for your design. Therefore it is strongly recommended that the design registration application should be filed as early as possible.
At the same time, if you have plans to file an application overseas, it is also necessary to give considerations to the exceptions to lack of novelty in each country.
An applicant for a design registration who is seeking the application of Paragraph (2) is required to take the following three procedures as listed in (a) to (c).
Since there is no prescribed contents or forms for the "Proving Document" legally required by Article 4, Paragraph (3) of Design Act, certificates to be submitted may contain various contents or forms. However, In order to be granted Exception of Lack of Novelty, "Proving Document" must prove the following:
- A design registration application has been filed for the design within one year from the date on which the design was published. (Fact of Publication, See3.1)
- The design was published as a result of an act of the right holder(s), and the right holder(s) filed the design registration application. (Facts of Succession to the Right to Obtain a Patent, etc., See 3.2)
If the "Proving Document" is found insufficient in proving that the design published before the design registration application is a design to which Article 4, Paragraph (2) of the Design Act is applicable, there is a possibility that the application of Paragraph (2) shall be denied and a notification of reasons for refusal or an invalidation trial decision denying the novelty or creative difficulty of the design pertaining to the design registration application based on such published design shall be made. Nevertheless, in such case, the applicant may submit supplementary materials, such as objective evidentiary material or a certificate by a third party, to attest the truth of the matters stated in the certificate previously prepared and submitted by him/her through a written opinion or written report, even after 30 days have passed from the filing date of the design registration application.
In order to prove that a design registration application has been filed within one year from the date on which the design was published, it is recommended to make statements on the following items:
(i) Date of publication
(ii) Place of publication
(iii) Name(s) of the person(s) who published the design
(iv) Contents of the design published (attach the photograph(s) or image(s) to specify the subject to be proved)
In order to prove that the design was published as a result of an act of the right holder(s), and the right holder(s) filed the design registration application, it is recommended to make statements on the following items:
(i) Creator(s) of the design published;
(ii) Person(s) having the right to obtain a design registration at the time of the act causing the publication of the design (Right holder(s) at the time of the act);
(iii) Applicant(s) for a design registration (the person(s) stated in the application);
(iv) Person(s) who published the design (the person(s) is the same as the one in 3.1 (iii) above);
(v) Succession to the right to obtain a design registration;
(The fact that the right has been transferred to the person stated in item (iii) from the person stated in item (i) via the person stated in item (ii), etc.)
(vi) Relationship between the right holder(s) at the time of the act and the person(s) who published the design
(State that the person(s) who published the design in (iv) made the publication of the design as a result of the act of the right holder(s) at the time of the act in (ii)).
The following is an example of description according to the typical situation of publishing a design.
[Last updated 9 November 2021]
Contact Us |
Design Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office E-mail: PA1D00@jpo.go.jp |